Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Classic Mystery Annotation: The Hound of the Baskervilles

The Hound of the Baskervilles
By: Sir Arthur Conan Doyle







Synopsis: Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson are enlisted to unravel the curious circumstances surrounding the demise of the most recent occupant of the Baskerville Estate and, in so doing, prevent the death of new owner. Locals fear the legend of a demon hound haunting the Baskerville family is true, but Sherlock Holmes suspects something more sinister is afoot.

Genre: This tale is most definitely a mystery; a classic detective novel.

Pacing: Fast-Paced

Tone: Suspenseful

Characteristics that Make it a Mystery:

  • The solving of a crime, usually a murder, drives the plot
  • The reader sorts through clues along with the detective
  • The frame of the mystery is crucial to its appeal (foggy moor-land, old estate in this case)
  • Story is fast-paced, moving the reader towards the solution
  • Main characters are recurring
Read-a-likes:

  • Relic by Douglas J. Preston (for those who like Sherlock, but prefer a more modern style)
  • Fer-de-Lance by Rex Stout (a more classic mystery style)
  • Any other Sherlock Holmes title by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
  • The Secret Cases of Sherlock Holmes by Donald Serrell Thomas (for those who have read all the Doyle stories, but can't get enough Holmes)
My thoughts: Well for the first time this year I'm going to give a book my Highwater Mark. I love Sherlock Holmes and this book is no exception. I love engaging my mind when I read and Sherlock stories allow me to try my hand at solving the case along with "The World's Greatest Detective." I had not read this one, shockingly enough, prior to this class, and I can say that is my favorite one so far. For readers that love a good mystery but like to avoid all the gory details of a murder, then Sherlock Holmes is a good choice. Doyle weaves intricate details together for a satisfying conclusion and develops his characters exceedingly well. Throw in a fair amount of good humor and you have a great read. Highly recommended. Also, reading a few Sherlock stories will help you appreciate the Robert Downey Jr. movies even more.

Week 7 Prompt: The James Frey Fiasco

I remember the hoopla "A Million Little Pieces" caused when it first came out. I also remember the hoopla it caused when it was shown to be mostly fictitious. I have never read the book, but remember thinking it was very amusing that people were up in arms over what, in my opinion, is nothing to get worked up about. In fact, I think that it would have been better if the lie had never been exposed.

First let me state my opinion of Fake Memoirs. I have no issue with them as long as they are advertised as such. It is an effective and compelling story-telling method. One good example that comes to mind is Between Shades of Gray by Ruta Sepetys. It tells the story of a family sent away to force labor by Joseph Stalin from the perspective of the daughter who survived the ordeal. It was so well written that I had a hard time believing that it was not based off the author's family history. Obviously the events described in the book are real, but the characters are not. Okay, sorry for the side note. All that to say, that I am okay with fake memoirs as long as the author does not pass them off as true.

Now, in the case of James Frey, I definitely feel that what he did was wrong. It was a lie. Lying is wrong. Simple as that. However, everyone getting so worked up about it did not do any good. In fact, the article published by The Smoking Gun probably made James Frey more money than he made on initial book sales. I think they should have just left well enough alone. Eventually, he would have passed into distant memory and his book would be tucked away on the dusty shelves of some library (sorry, not all libraries have dusty shelves, but you get my point). And for the most part, that is what has happened but it has taken 8 years! Even still, the book is still read because it is controversial. So I feel that exposing James Frey as a liar gave him exactly what he wanted: more money and fame. He was wrong to do it, but he definitely profited from it. If the media could have left the story alone, we might not be talking about him anymore.

I know there will be people that disagree with my view on this. I can see how his passing his book of as true has made people skeptical of the real true stories out there. But in the end, he alone has to live with his lies and I think that keeping him out of the media will help him look himself in the mirror a little bit faster.

Saturday, February 22, 2014

Book Talk: Captain Underpants and the Revolting Revenge of the Radioactive Robo-Boxers


That's right. I'm attempting to book talk Captain Underpants. If you want to see how successful I was, click the link below.

Captain Underpants Book Talk


As far as agreeing with Baker's statement goes, I only partially agree. I agree that you should only talk about books that you have read. If you comment on books without having read them, you are no better than most of the people that want censor books. You should always talk from an informed standpoint. However, I don't think you only have to talk about books that you like. As a librarian, you should be able to discuss what others would enjoy about the book and its strengths. Not to mention, discussing why you didn't like a book can be entertaining and, in my opinion, make someone want to read a book just to so they can see if they agree or disagree with your assessment.

Friday, February 21, 2014

Romance Annotation: Redeeming Love

Redeeming Love
By: Francine Rivers








Synopsis: Angel, a popular prostitute during the California Gold Rush, expects nothing but betrayal from men, but when she meets Michael Hosea there is the opportunity for change. Michael, following God's prompting, marries Angel and loves her unconditionally despite her past; but can Angel accept that Michael truly loves her and, for that matter, that God does, too?

Genre: This is a romance novel, but on the tame side since it is a Christian Historical Fiction Romance.

Characteristics that Make it a Romance:

  • Love story dominates the plot
  • Characters grow and develop into their romance
  • Told from both protagonists viewpoints
  • Lovers end up together in the end for a happy ending
Read-a-likes:

  • A Touch of Grace by Lauraine Snelling (Christian Historical Fiction Romance)
  • Whatever Tomorrow Brings by Lori Wick (Christian Historical Fiction Romance)
  • The Marrying Season by Candace Camp (Historical Romance)
My Thoughts: So, I readily admit that this was my first true romance novel ever and I also readily admit that I enjoyed it. It falls into the "Rising Tide" category for my rankings and that is only because it is not my preferred genre. The story is beautifully told and the characters are well-developed. This novel is also a more modern re-telling of the biblical story of Gomer and Hosea, which can add an extra element of intrigue for those familiar with the story or those interested in biblical history. Perhaps the most amazing aspect of this novel in my opinion, is that Francine Rivers weaves two love stories into one novel. Clearly there is the relationship between Michael and Angel, but it is also the story of love and redemption between Angel and God. Overall, it is a very moving story that should not be limited to only those of the female persuasion. It's no wonder this book has been in print for 20 years.

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Kirkus Style Review- The Inner Circle

The discovery a 200 year old dictionary containing cryptic messages suggesting that George Washington's most trusted spies, the Culper Ring, may still be in existence is only the beginning of a dark conspiracy that unfolds within the pages of this fast-paced thriller.

Beecher White, an archivist working in the National Archives, is unintentionally thrust into a conspiracy of presidential proportions when he and an old high school crush, Clementine Kaye, locate the 200 year old dictionary in the bottom of a hollowed out chair. The problem: the chair is in a study room in the National Archives awaiting the arrival of the current President of the United States. A friendly security guard helps cover their tracks, but is dead within hours. Beecher and Clementine are forced to to uncover the secret of the dictionary or suffer the same fate as the security guard. The dictionary seems to imply that the Culper Ring, rumored to have been started by George Washington, is still active today. With no one to trust, Beecher and Clementine turn to Clementine's estranged father the institutionalized Nico Hadrian. For Meltzer fans, this name marks the return of a character that attempted to assassinate a former president in Melzter's novel The Book of Fate. Can the madman provide insight into the dubious dealings of the current president and his inner circle? Does the Culper Ring still exist? If they do, are they operating for good or evil? All these questions are answered in Meltzer's trademark fast-paced, short chapter style that is sure to leave the reader wanting more. Which is a good thing because the book's ending suggests that Meltzer may begin a series for the first time.

Conspiracy stories are best when laced with enough fact to make them believable, and Meltzer is at the top of his game with this novel. Fans are sure to love this book as Meltzer only seems to get better with each novel he pens.


Friday, February 14, 2014

Week 5 Prompt

    I'll deal with the Amazon reviews first. I feel that these two reviews do no meet the standards of a well constructed review. I would not consider them to be reliable for several reasons. In Erin's powerpoint presentation, we read John Updike's guidelines for writing reviews and these two reviews do not do a good job of following these guidelines. Neither review quotes from the book, so I have only their word to go by. Also, the second review seems to analyze what the author was trying to accomplish, but without direct quotes I have no idea whether her analysis is valid. Furthermore, the first review gives away entirely too much of the story. After reading her summary, I feel like I can fill in the gaps and use my reading time elsewhere. Given that the book is only available in ebook, I might still look to add it to my library's collection since romance novels actually circulate well in ebook format. That said, the reviews would give me some pause about buying this ebook.

   The reviews of Angela's Ashes are clearly more credible since they are professionally published. While they do not follow all of Erin's suggestions to the letter, they do a very good job and are written in a way the allows me to reconcile the reviewer's opinion with textual evidence. I would feel very comfortable adding this book to my library collection based on these reviews.

 
   Overall, I feel that if you are a selector for you library you have to view reviews as tool to help you select and nothing more. They must be taken with a grain of salt. For example, a book may not get great reviews, but you may know that it would go over well with the patrons you serve. In that situation, the reviews go out the window. In many cases, as we saw in the examples, certain types of books, like romance, do not get high quality reviews. On the other hand, other types of books, those deemed more "literary," will get over-reviewed. This can skew a library's collection away from great titles. In recent years, independently published books have become extremely popular. However, the lack of credible reviews can prevent these titles from being in a public libraries collection. The job of selecting books is made even tougher by sites that won't publish negative reviews. If everything about a book is glowing, it doesn't help a selector make a truly informed decision. That is why I say selectors need to use reviews only as a tool, but rely more on their knowledge of the patrons they serve and their interests.

   On a personal note, I like to read reviews for my personal reads, but I don't put much stock in them. I will read reviews to see what the popular opinion is on a title. However, I generally decide to read a book based largely on subject matter. I really enjoy giving new authors a try so reviews don't always mean much to me.

Saturday, February 8, 2014

Secret Shopper Assignment

   So I visited a smaller library in another county. As far as I can tell from their website, there is only one main branch in this library system. I actually visited this library twice. My first visit was on a Saturday. Upon entering the library, I noticed that it was an had an older-style feel to it. The architecture seemed very similar to my library's original building before we moved to our new location 9 years ago. I followed the signs to the adult reference desk, but found no one sitting there. I self-toured the library and after waiting about a half hour decided to come back another time since no one had shown up at the desk and I hadn't found a librarian while walking around. I figured that since it was a Saturday they were probably operating on a skeleton crew. There were two workers at the circulation desk, but they were busy helping patrons and, being a circulation manager, I didn't want to bother them.
   I next visited on a Friday. Again, I made my way to the reference desk and, again, I found it unmanned. Also, I did not see any literature available at the desk. Though they did seem to be gearing up for a "Blind Date with a Book" program for February. At this point, I decided to just ask a circulation worker for help, even though they may not be a librarian. After waiting my turn, I asked the lady behind the desk if she felt qualified to recommend a book because I just wanted to sit and read for awhile. She seemed a little uncertain, but was consistently welcoming in her demeanor. She never lost her smile. She immediately asked about the last book I had read. I told her that it was I, Saul by Jerry B. Jenkins.
   Mostly under her breath, she admitted that she had never heard of Jerry B. Jenkins, but began typing away at her computer. She then informed me that recommendations were not her specialty, but that the "expert" was at lunch so she would do the best she could. I told her that I always ask tough questions and that it was alright. She then assured me that my question was a "great question." At this point, she asked me if I wanted to read something similar to Jerry B. Jenkins. I told her that would be great.
   Her first suggestion was Tim LaHaye and she asked if I had ever heard of him. I told her that I was pretty sure that he had coauthored some books with Jerry B. Jenkins (knowing full well that he had). She told me that the book she had looked like a stand alone called Thunder of Heaven. I felt like this was a good recommendation, since it was clearly in the same Christian Fiction genre, but I only nodded so I could see how she proceeded. She then said that another option would be The Twelfth Imam by Joel Rosenberg. This was an author I was vaguely familiar with, but wasn't sure if he was Christian Fiction. I asked her what the book was about and she turned the computer screen toward me. At this point, I could tell that she had been using Amazon to help her recommend books. I read the description and told her that that sounded like a good choice. She checked to see if it was on the shelf (it was) and asked if I needed help finding it. I told her I could find it and went to find the book.
   Upon finding the book, I was surprised and pleased to find that Rosenberg was a Christian Fiction author. The book had a sticker on the spine labeling it as such. I also read the first two chapters and found it to be very similar to the type of Christian Fiction I enjoy. In fact, I might have to add it to my ever increasing reading list. 
   Overall, I felt like this was a good experience. Despite her lack of confidence, the circulation worker made sure that I felt comfortable and that my needs were important. More than that, she actually found a book I would read. We didn't have much a conversation about what I wanted as it suggests in "Conducting the Reference Interveiw," (p.167). However, we still arrived at a good recommendation and she was not judgmental, another biggie (p. 175). Since I was dealing with someone who did not have an MLS and probably had little to no experience in RA, I consider my experience a success.

References: Ross, C. S., Nilsen, K., & Dewdney, P. (2002). The readers’ advisory interview. In Conducting the Reference Interview (pp. 163-175). New York: Neal-Schuman.

P.S. I have to admit that once I was done I went back and told the circulation worker that I was really and MLS student doing a homework assignment and that she had done a good job. I just couldn't keep the charade up any longer.